Saina fails in quest to defend Singapore Open

Singapore: Fourth seed Saina Nehwal suffered one of her biggest blows this season, failing in her defence of the Singapore Open Superseries – indeed, failing even to reach the quarterfinals. The Indian was beaten in the second round by Chinese Taipei’s Chen Shao Chieh, 8-21 21-10 21-19.
Saina’s defeat ended the Indian interest in the competition, as her compatriot Arundhati Pantwane had lost her first round match late Wednesday.
The match showcased a dramatic change in fortunes. Saina demolished Cheng in the first game, leading from start to finish and allowing her opponent only eight points.
However, from then on, the Indian was below par, as Cheng gave Saina the same treatment, equaling at one game-all by winning the second 21-10. The decider was tight, and both were locked in a tense battle until 14-all. From there, Cheng took four consecutive points, and then maintained the lead to take the game and match.
Meanwhile, the other big draw in the tournament, Indonesia’s Taufik Hidayat, fell to China’s Wang Zhengming in the second round. Wang, who won the World Juniors the same year as Saina, in 2008, won a three-set battle and will take on current World Junior champion Viktor Axelsen of Denmark. Others to make the quarters included world champion Lin Dan and Denmark’s Peter Gade, apart from two other Chinese, Chen Jin and Du Pengyu.
In the women’s singles, Saina’s vanquisher Cheng faces Denmark’s Tine Baun, while three Chinese moved into the quarters. That included world No.1 Wang Shixian, No.3 Wang Xin, and No.2 Wang Yihan.

About badmintonmania

Sometimes I wonder if I'm the Indian in Thoreau's Walden who makes cane baskets and is surprised nobody wants them. A. was talking about discipline when she said: "But Dev, if you want to move ahead in life, you'll have to be like that," and she may as well have defined everything else for me. I've played the low percentage game for too long to believe there's anything in it but the romance; the odds keep getting jacked up higher and higher; and you may be a good Idealist but a worse Fool.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s